Oath Keepers. A Wonderful Sign: A letter to the writer

A letter to the Writer by RJL

The “critics” are mainly, and effectually solely, one. In your published piece as in kindred ones on this subject of outrage and fear at the actions of America’s first transparent dictator as president, the “critics” are this ubiquitous and very tendentious Potok person of the “Southern…” etc., . He claims “false conspiracy theories” and intimates (or the press writers do) “white supremacists groups” , here including even connections with Timothy McVeigh poised in ways to assure an association with the name together with “plausible denial” of plausibility simply.

All whites are supremacists to men such as Potok. In truth the Elites who brought Obama to the Presidency of our country are dedicated to a vision of existence itself along these very lines. This alliance has a name, or at least I think it has. It’s The Convergence of Islam and Western Elites. (It had been called Hegel-Robespierre –and this by its most famous commentator and supporter. His name is Alexandre Kojeve. See the profile on him in his own book on the Phenomenology, intro by Straussian Allen Bloom. Amazon, 2 seconds.) And these combinations together cannot fail to explain what they mean. Potok hates all whites for once being superior in the ultimate thing he most hates above all things on the earth.

This is the will and capacity for ordered existence in a nation of its peoples; in his case, Jews. But the reason for his hatred, the Jews’ nation being that of G-d’s people as chosen, turns upon a hatred of this –of these words italicized here. And this hatred is a hatred of Being as given (distinguished from Being which is not-given). I apologize for so high-sounding a conception. But I am so often asked “why are Jews always liberals or left wing? Why do they also support revolutionaries seeking global order –the World State?” Well, this is the reason. Jews, the malshenim, hate G-d. They prize not-given Being, which is profoundest atheism. As for “a nation of its peoples” it is what Obama calls (with him and all of the Elites who converge with Islam) racism. Thus your own easy allusion to “white supremacists.”

I am certain all whites are not supremacists. But I am just as certain hardly any whites, any where or any time are racists. I have explained this elsewhere. But it's an easy demonstration. I once heard a famous journalist --a conservative writer for the NYT, if you can understand what that is. Well, he was asked if Buchanan was a racist. His answer was along these lines: If Hitler is the definition of racist, number 10 on the scale of 1 to 10, then Buchanan must be at least 6 or 8.

Now unless you're simply a damn fool (like this NYT writer, a Jew as I recall), you've just learned a simple truth about the absurdity of "Zero toleration for discrimination." This is zero toleration for discrimination. If you can't tell the difference, i.e., to discriminate mass murder from Speech about race, you belong in a kind of madhouse. I know many of a single kind. These are Western societies wherein the truth of peoplehood, "racist" societies, indiscriminacy in the minds of the white Elites and their peoples in these times, is racism. The truth of national life is the truth of peoplehood. One people. Hitler didn't conceive this notion or indeed had he, he would have conceived aright.

The founder of national existence (in the Western conception until about 3 centuries ago), was of course, and of all things, G-d --who imposed it on a single man, Moses. He almost gave up trying to impose it on the non-people who are the benai Torah: the Jews. While their failure at it amounted to at least the perpetration of national life in Christian peoples over almost two millennia as "Judeo-Christianity", the Jews continuing their hatred of national existence to this day, not a few have turned. It's about 25%. This is worth thinking about as you read what follows. 

What you (the writer about Oath Keepers) are actually confronting at the same time not confronting it, is the Convergence of Islam and Western [white] Elites. Driving this convergence is this matter of Being v not-given Being. It objectifies in phenomenologies. Men do not live in the worlds of such a thing as “Being v not-given Being.”  In our circumstances, these phenomenologies are just the things you deal with in your news story. But when you find a Jew (as you  cannot help to find in Western societies) like Potok, someone who is driven to expose “white supremacists” with respect to the “falsity of conspiracy theories” this should be a red flag to you.

The reason it does not appear this way is because your grip upon reality, your daily experience in context of writing news stories, is bounded by the narrowest possible lines. These are the ones you're given in public discourse, and have taken for your own. These perimeters fail you when you aspire to explain such action as that of the police officers and others who are watching America and American life undergoing what is the likeliest result or its final destruction.

You had an opportunity to show some measure of courage and skill in this instance of men prepared to show just these things, who are the object of your report. You might have taken this opportunity. And you could have begun easily by noting that Mr. Potok is at least a garden variety Jewish scold, a man of the Left as people say. Or  even you could have consulted the name David Yerushalmi, called a “Jewish Fascist” on google in the neighborhood of his name in the same spirit of venom applied by Potok to these white Christians.

Yerushalmi is the attorney presently trying the case against Obama and his government in the AIG case.  Yerushalmi would tell you Potok is a member in an ancient, very large (majority) class of Jews. The camp of the "slanderers," the traitors, informers or malshenim, men so contemptible and vile that at last the Jews added a prayer, the 19^th of the three-times-each-day prayer of The Eighteen Blessings, to beg for the destruction of the malshenim at the hand of Heaven. You may know about these things. But what you did, seeding the whole in a relativist-nihilist basis (“it’s all a matter of opinion”), thus to write what those Elites just mentioned would accept is a defense of Obama (when it’s plainly a matter of tyranny.) You demonstrated the mode of the racist-chasers, university professors and the like, that is you exercised Zero toleration for discrimination

You could have known all about this in a single email or phone call. You’d have made a name for yourself, and done something brave and needed in the world, like these men you wrote about, instead of whittling them down to your size.

I will send this note to you to the Rhodes individual you mention, and to Yerushalmi; as well as to some others. My object is not to embarrass you, but to put a better picture of the truth in the minds of these and like people. I will urge them to look at your article.

All the best,

RJL

Printer-Friendly Version